The Lawson's completed their trio of false reviews about me and my firm on January 24, 2026, when Catherine Lawson posted the following lie on Google:
0 reviews • 0 photos
2 days ago New
I am a person with Down Syndrome and I felt our lawyer Glenn Reiser kept me out of the talks concerning our case. When I told him I wanted to testify he told me to “sit in the courtroom and look pretty”. Glenn was not nice to my mom and Glenn told her if we did not agree to the settlement he came up with he would walk out on us and not be our lawyer any more. This made my mother very upset that she cried. I was upset and disappointed too. Glenn is not a nice person at all. I am my own person and he did not listen to my advice. This is my own review. Thank you very much. Signed Catherine Lawson.
================================================================================
Catherine was in the courtroom on June 10, 2024 when the settlement terms were placed on the record and confirmed by her mother's and brother's testimony.
In September 2024, the trial court entered an order enforcing the settlement. At that time, the Lawson's were represented by their third attorney.
Undeterred by their failure to vacate the settlement in 2024, the Lawson's employed a new strategy in July 2025 when they filed a motion to vacate the settlment. This time, the Lawson's argued that we deliberately excluded Catherine from the settlement process even though she was in Court on June 10, 2024 when the settlment terms were placed on the record in the presence of the trial judge and both her mother and brother confirmed their acceptance, while also acknowledging their satisfaction with the quality of legal services that we provied. The trial court rejected this frivolous motion to vacate the settlement. An order denying their motion was entered in November 2025.
Still not satisfied, Catherine (or most likely her brother Raef Lawson) proceeded to post their third false Google review about me and my firm on January 24, 2026.
Here is my public Google response to Catherine's false review:
Glenn R. Reiser, Esq.
Owner
2 days ago
I reject this review as false, defamatory, and flatly contradicted by the public court record.
After multiple days of trial, the case was resolved through a settlement that was placed on the record in open court. Catherine was present in the courtroom for the settlement hearing, as were her other family members who were my clients. Catherine’s mother and brother expressly approved the settlement on the record and affirmatively acknowledged to the trial judge that they were satisfied with my firm’s legal services. Based on that record, the Court approved the settlement. The same public court file further reflects that after approving it in open court, this family later sought to vacate the very settlement they had approved—and those efforts were denied twice.
I unequivocally deny ever using demeaning language, excluding Catherine from the process, threatening to abandon representation, or mistreating any member of this family. Those accusations are baseless and directly inconsistent with statements made in open court and preserved in the Court’s public file.
The only negative Google reviews about me are a series of coordinated attacks by members of this same family, published only after they failed to unwind a settlement they themselves approved on the record. Anyone considering this review should also read the dozens of other client reviews here that reflect the truth about my representation, results, and reputation.
After multiple days of trial, the case was resolved through a settlement that was placed on the record in open court. Catherine was present in the courtroom for the settlement hearing, as were her other family members who were my clients. Catherine’s mother and brother expressly approved the settlement on the record and affirmatively acknowledged to the trial judge that they were satisfied with my firm’s legal services. Based on that record, the Court approved the settlement. The same public court file further reflects that after approving it in open court, this family later sought to vacate the very settlement they had approved—and those efforts were denied twice.
I unequivocally deny ever using demeaning language, excluding Catherine from the process, threatening to abandon representation, or mistreating any member of this family. Those accusations are baseless and directly inconsistent with statements made in open court and preserved in the Court’s public file.
The only negative Google reviews about me are a series of coordinated attacks by members of this same family, published only after they failed to unwind a settlement they themselves approved on the record. Anyone considering this review should also read the dozens of other client reviews here that reflect the truth about my representation, results, and reputation.
This blog post sets the record straight.
No comments:
Post a Comment